Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

The Journal covers the whole spectrum of intelligent informatics, which includes, but is not limited to :

  • Artificial Immune Systems, Ant Colonies, and Swarm Intelligence 
  • Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
  • Bayesian Networks and Probabilistic Reasoning
  • Biologically Inspired Intelligence
  • Brain-Computer Interfacing
  • Business Intelligence
  • Chaos theory and intelligent control systems
  • Clustering and Data Analysis
  • Complex Systems and Applications
  • Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing
  • Cognitive systems
  • Distributed Intelligent Systems
  • Database Management and Information Retrieval
  • Evolutionary computation and DNA/cellular/molecular computing
  • Expert Systems
  • Fault detection, fault analysis and diagnostics
  • Fusion of Neural Networks and Fuzzy Systems
  • Green and Renewable Energy Systems
  • Human Interface, Human-Computer Interaction, Human Information Processing
  • Hybrid and Distributed Algorithms
  • High Performance Computing
  • Information storage, security, integrity, privacy and trust
  • Image and Speech Signal Processing
  • Knowledge Based Systems, Knowledge Networks
  • Knowledge discovery and ontology engineering
  • Machine Learning, Reinforcement Learning
  • Memetic Computing
  • Multimedia and Applications
  • Networked Control Systems
  • Neural Networks and Applications
  • Natural Language Processing
  • Optimization and Decision Making
  • Pattern Classification, Recognition, speech recognition and synthesis 
  • Robotic Intelligence
  • Rough sets and granular computing
  • Robustness Analysis
  • Self-Organizing Systems
  • Social Intelligence
  • Soft computing in P2P, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing Technologies 
  • Stochastic systems
  • Support Vector Machines
  • Ubiquitous, grid and high performance computing
  • Virtual Reality in Engineering Applications
  • Web and mobile Intelligence, and Big Data

 

Section Policies

Editorials

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Conference Papers

The journal is welcome to collaboration with the conference organisers to publish papers are accepted in their conferences which represent ideas related the IJAIN journal. The Conferece Papers (CP) section will not be refereed and will be edited by the conference editor. The papers will be appear as a special issues in this journal.

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Retraction notice

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

The submitted manuscript is first reviewed by an editor. It will be evaluated in the office, whether it is suitable for International Journal of Advances in Intelligent Informatics focus and scope or has a major methodological flaw and similiarity score by using iThenticate.

The manuscript will be sent to at least two anonymous reviewers (Single Blind Review). Reviewers' comments are then sent to the corresponding author for necessary actions and responses.

The suggested decision will be evaluated in an editorial board meeting. Afterwards, the editor will send the final decision to the corresponding author.

 

Publication Frequency

This journal is published three times a year (March, July, November)

 

Open Access Policy

This journal is an open access journal which provides immediate, worldwide, barrier-free access to the full text of all published articles without charge readers or their institutions for access. Readers have right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of all articles in International Journal of Advances in Intelligent Informatics. This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Section A: Publication and authorship 

  1. All submitted papers are subject to strict peer-review process by at least two international reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular paper.
  2. Review process are blind peer review.
  3. The factors that are taken into account in review are relevance, soundness, significance, originality, readability and language.
  4. The possible decisions include acceptance, acceptance with revisions, or rejection.
  5. If authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit a submission, there is no guarantee that the revised submission will be accepted.
  6. Rejected articles will not be re-reviewed.
  7. The paper acceptance is constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism.
  8. No research can be included in more than one publication. 

Section B: Authors’ responsibilities

  1. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work.
  2. Authors must certify that the manuscript has not previously been published elsewhere.
  3. Authors must certify that the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. 
  4. Authors must participate in the peer review process. 
  5. Authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.
  6. All Authors mentioned in the paper must have significantly contributed to the research.
  7. Authors must state that all data in the paper are real and authentic.
  8. Authors must notify the Editors of any conflicts of interest.
  9. Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript.
  10. Authors must report any errors they discover in their published paper to the Editors. 

Section C: Reviewers’ responsibilities

  1. Reviewers should keep all information regarding papers confidential and treat them as privileged information. 
  2. Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author
  3. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments
  4. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors.
  5. Reviewers should also call to the Editor in Chief’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
  6. Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. 

Section D: Editors’ responsibilities

  1. Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article.
  2. Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication.
  3. Editors should always consider the needs of the authors and the readers when attempting to improve the publication.
  4. Editors should guarantee the quality of the papers and the integrity of the academic record.
  5. Editors should publish errata pages or make corrections when needed.
  6. Editors should have a clear picture of a research’s funding sources.
  7. Editors should base their decisions solely one the papers’ importance, originality, clarity and relevance to publication’s scope.
  8. Editors should not reverse their decisions nor overturn the ones of previous editors without serious reason. 
  9. Editors should preserve the anonymity of reviewers. 
  10. Editors should ensure that all research material they publish conforms to internationally accepted ethical guidelines.
  11. Editors should only accept a paper when reasonably certain.
  12. Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all reasonable attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem.
  13. Editors should not reject papers based on suspicions, they should have proof of misconduct.
  14. Editors should not allow any conflicts of interest between staff, authors, reviewers and board members.

 

Retraction

The papers published in the International Journal of Advances in Intelligent Informatics will be consider to retract in the publication if :

  1. They have clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g. data fabri-cation) or honest error (e.g. miscalculation or experimental error)
  2. the findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper crossreferencing, permission orjustification (i.e. cases of redundant publication)
  3. it constitutes plagiarism
  4. it reports unethical research

The mechanism of retraction follow the Retraction Guidelines of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) which can be accessed at https://publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20guidelines.pdf.

 

CrossMark policy

 CrossMark 

CrossMark is a multi-publisher initiative from Crossref to provide a standard way for readers to locate the current version of a piece of content.

By applying the Crossmark logo, International Journal of Advances in Intelligent Informatics is committing to maintaining the content it publishes and to alerting readers to changes if and when they occur. 

Clicking on the Crossmark logo on a document will tell you the current status of a document and may also give you additional publication record information about the document.

For more information on CrossMark, please visit the CrossMark site.

The International Journal of Advances in Intelligent Informatics content that will have the CrossMark logo is restricted to current and future journal content and is limited to specific publication types. Articles in Press will not have the CrossMark icon for the present.

For general author guidelines and information, please see: http://ijain.org/index.php/IJAIN/about/submissions#authorGuidelines 

Correction and Retraction Policies

The International Journal of Advances in Intelligent Informatics is committed to upholding the integrity of the literature and publishes Errata, Expressions of Concerns or Retraction Notices dependent on the situation and in accordance with the COPE Retraction Guidelines. More information about the publication of ethics International Journal of Advances in Intelligent Informatics can be found on Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement and information about COPE retraction guidelines can be accessed at Retraction page.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26555/ijain.crossmark.policy

 

Author(s) Fee

Ijain journal does not charge any publication fee for the author(s) who have submission date on 2017

Start from 2018, for service improvement, this journal will charge the following author fees:

1. Article Publication Cost (150 USD).  For supporting the cost of wide open access dissemination of research results, managing the various costs associated with handling and editing of the submitted manuscripts, and the Journal management and publication in general, the authors or the author's institution is requested to pay a publication fee for each article accepted. The fee covers :

  • The standard twelve (12) pages manuscript. For every additional page an extra fee of 30 USD per page will be charged. 
  • The payment also included delivery fees of the hardcopy to the corresponding author
  • DOI registration for each paper.
  • Checking the article similarity by iThenticate; the final result will be send to authors.
  • FREE OF CHARGE will be available for paper submission of authors, from minimum two countries.

2. Fast-Track Review Fee (50 USD). With the payment of this fee, the review, editorial decision, and author notification of the submitted manuscript is guaranteed to take place within 3 weeks. However, we do not guarantee that the paper will be accepted for publication in this journal.

Instructions for money transfer via bank transfer will be provided by the editor with the notification of acceptance for the accepted paper.

A waiver or partial waiver of author fees may be decided by the editor in case of lack of fundingexcessive length of submitted manuscript or other reasonable reasons provided by the author during the submission. The author should clearly declare that he asks for a waiver in the comments to the Editor box during their submission. A waiver is most likely to be denied if it is not asked in this stage. The waiver will have no effect to the review result.